Revisions? The Computer Says No

The next two blog entries were are going to be about rounds 2 and 3 of Soul Enchi­lada. I learned scads about writ­ing doing these revi­sions. It wouldn’t be a stretch to say that I became a writer some­where dur­ing the con­ve­nience store scene, some­where between the Vienna sausages and canned chili. In writ­ing about the revi­sions, I learned some­thing about myself as a blog­ger: I don’t want to post about the writ­ing process. I’ve always stayed away from get­ting too per­sonal in my blog, and talk­ing about the revi­sions felt too inti­mate.

So here instead, is my revised post on revi­sion.
On sec­ond thought, some folks were fol­low­ing the process, so I’ll go ahead and do the posts. In Sum­mary: Revi­sions 2 and 3 are fin­ished. They were a whirl­wind, one that I enjoyed immensely. The book is a bet­ter book. I’m a bet­ter writer. My edi­tor is worse for wear. The man­u­script is off to copy­edit­ing, so I can actu­ally read a book with­out wor­ry­ing that my own writ­ing will be affected. My to-be-read stack is lit­er­ally taller than I am.

Harper­Friend Alert: Teri Lesesne,

and the God­dess of YA has reviewed Harper author Sarah

Prineas’ The Magic Thief, which strangely is not on my read­ing pile. Hmm. Where are my car keys?

And Now For Some­thing Dif­fer­ent Alert: The Amer­i­can ver­sion of Lit­tle Britain is being shot in Wilmy­Wood now.

Comments are disabled for this post